From the Individualed Prevalence Estimator section, we know that is unbiased with the computed variance.
This being a point prevalence cross-section study, the total skin disease burden is most likely underestimated since point prevalence studies often miss diseases of short duration.
The trend of rising cesarean sections observed in the developed and developing world is also evident in the oPt, where the prevalence of cesarean section deliveries has more than doubled over the past decade [9].
The prevalence of cesarean section deliveries continues to rise in most developed [1] and developing [2] countries.
No significant differences were found between the private and governmental sectors in the prevalence of cesarean section deliveries.
The prevalence of cesarean section, preeclampsia, and GDM in Danish obese women is 28, 7.6, and 8.7%, respectively (5).
The prevalence of caesarean section in Brazil was 52.2% in 2010 [ 69], ranging from 58.2% (Southeast Region) to 41.7% (North Region) [ 68].
As demonstrated by the HAPO studies, there are continuous associations between maternal glucose levels and increasing birth weight and prevalence of caesarean section [ 6, 14, 25].
The prevalence of cesarean section deliveries in the oPt was 14.8%, with no difference between the West Bank and Gaza Strip (15.2% and 14.3%, respectively).
