Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
For a number of designs (which form nontrivial braids), we investigate the prevalence of ghost rods that effectively replace stationary stirring rods (baffles) as the latter are removed from the batch mixer.
Four cross-sectional survey publications reported the prevalence of ghost authoring.
The prevalence of ghost authors was not significantly different by article type between 2008 and 1996.
15 They found a high prevalence of honorary authors (39%) and a lower prevalence of ghost authors (9%).
The prevalence of ghost authoring (which included ghostwriting) was estimated to be 11.5% in 1996 and 7.9% in 2008.
21 24263131 The prevalence of ghost authoring reported in these cross-sectional surveys varied from 0.7%to70%0% of publications or authors.
Similar(50)
In a desire to "crack down" on it, some have introduced new features and accompanying campaigns aimed at reducing the prevalence of ghosting because experts (aren't we all experts on ghosting, really) have said that ghosting makes people feel that they are disposable, which is not good for anyone.
In a desire to "crack down" on it, some have introduced new features and accompanying campaigns aimed at reducing the prevalence of ghosting, because experts (aren't we all experts on ghosting, really) have said that ghosting makes people feel that they are disposable.
Each article served as the unit of analysis for determining the prevalence of honorary or ghost authors.
Objectives To assess the prevalence of honorary and ghost authors in six leading general medical journals in 2008 and compare this with the prevalence reported by authors of articles published in 1996.
14 We hypothesised that the prevalence of articles with honorary and ghost authorship would decline, that the prevalence of honorary and ghost authors would vary by article type, and that inappropriate authorship would be more prevalent in the two journals in our study that do not publicly require and report author contributions than in the four journals that do.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com