Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

prevalence of frequency

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "prevalence of frequency" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to discuss how often something occurs, but the combination of "prevalence" and "frequency" is redundant. Example: "The prevalence of frequency in this study indicates that the event occurs regularly."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

van Brummen et al. [ 2] analyzed nulliparous women and reported a prevalence of frequency symptoms of 74.2%, with the prevalence remaining high until the third trimester.

These findings are similar to the results of Sun et al. [ 7]. van Brummen et al. [ 2] reported a high prevalence of frequency and urgency symptoms at 12 weeks of gestational age and that these symptoms then remained stable during the other two trimesters.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

We defined frequency as more than 8 voids per day and nocturia as more than one void per night (as in some earlier reports [3] [5], [18]) while those definitions are presumably clinically more relevant based on prevalences of frequency and nocturia in earlier studies [9], [16], [26], [27].

Science

Plosone

The multiparous pregnant women had higher prevalence rates of frequency and nocturia compared with the nulliparous women, which is comparable to the report of Stanton et al. [ 14].

Increasing prevalence rates of frequency, nocturia, SUI, and incomplete emptying were reported with gestational age in both the nulliparous and multiparous women.

Increased prevalence rates of frequency, nocturia, SUI, and incomplete emptying were found with increasing gestational age in both the nulliparous and the multiparous groups.

According to Table  2, the prevalence of OIDP frequency score in Norway was 29.0% and 28.4% (n.s) in 2007 and 2012, respectively.

Furthermore, the prevalence of high frequency hearing loss is increasing worldwide due to growing environmental and recreational noise and an ageing population.

Weak negative selection (−5 < Nes < −1), although ineffective at low allele frequencies, considerably reduces the prevalence of high-frequency polymorphisms and sites of interspecific divergence.

In contrast, in exons, the prevalence of low-frequency indels is notably reduced (fig. 2 A).

In addition to the increased prevalence of low frequencies, earlier stages of recovery are marked by hemispheric dissymmetry [ 38, 51– 51].

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "prevalence of frequency" as it is redundant. Opt for clearer alternatives like "frequency of occurrence" or simply "prevalence" depending on the intended meaning.

Common error

Be mindful of combining words that convey similar meanings. Using both "prevalence" and "frequency" together can make your writing sound repetitive and less professional. Choose the word that best fits your context.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

77%

Authority and reliability

2.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "prevalence of frequency" functions as a noun phrase, but its usage is grammatically questionable. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is considered incorrect and redundant, which affects its acceptability in formal writing.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "prevalence of frequency" is considered grammatically incorrect and redundant. Ludwig AI indicates that it does not convey a clear meaning and should be avoided in favor of more precise alternatives such as "frequency of occurrence" or simply "prevalence". While the contexts are mostly scientific, the phrase's flawed construction undermines its effectiveness. Therefore, it's advisable to choose clearer and more concise wording to express the intended meaning accurately.

FAQs

What does "prevalence" actually mean?

"Prevalence" refers to the proportion of a population that has a specific characteristic or condition at a particular time. It is often used in epidemiology to describe how widespread a disease is.

Is it ever correct to use "prevalence" and "frequency" in the same sentence?

While using both "prevalence" and "frequency" together isn't inherently wrong, it's often redundant. You can say "Together with a rising level of depression and cognitive impairment, the prevalence and frequency of sleep disorders in long term care residents is increasing". However consider if a single word would serve better.

What's a better way to describe how often something occurs?

Instead of "prevalence of frequency", consider using phrases like "rate of occurrence", "frequency of occurrence", or simply "incidence rate" depending on the context.

How does "prevalence" differ from "incidence"?

"Prevalence" measures the proportion of a population with a condition at a specific time, while "incidence" measures the rate at which new cases of a condition occur over a period. In simpler terms, prevalence is a snapshot, and incidence is a rate of new occurrences.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

77%

Authority and reliability

2.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: