Sentence examples for prevalence of administration from inspiring English sources

In a review of studies of the prevalence of administration errors, Keers et al. [ 70] found that 44%% of 91 studies did not attempt to determine the clinical significance of identified administration errors and that whilst 82%% of these studies used previously published severity tools, 18%% used their own criteria.

A comparison of the first cohort with controls in the nationwide survey showed that the prevalence of initial administration of IVIG was 80.2% versus 86.0%; the rate of additional IVIG administration was 7.1% versus 14.0% (p = 0.03); CAL prevalence in the acute period was 4.8% versus 11.9% (p < 0.01); and the prevalence of cardiovascular sequelae was 0% versus 3.8% (p < 0.05).

Despite prior reports associating cyclodextrin in intravenous formulations with renal failure [ 17], we did not find a difference in prevalence of intravenous dose administration between patients who did and did not have renal failure.

The study had a large sample size of almost 18 000 women, and we were able to examine prevalence using different modes of administration (anonymised, self-administered, postal survey, trained government interview, antenatal midwife-collected data) and timing of administration including prospective and retrospective measurement.

We were able to examine prevalence using different modes of administration (anonymised self-administered postal survey in PRAMS, trained government interview in GUI, antenatal midwife-collected data in SCOPE) and timing of administration (2 9 months postpartum in PRAMS, 9 12 months postpartum in GUI, and in the second trimester of pregnancy in SCOPE).

In the simulated campaigns discussed above, administration of DP results in equal or lower prevalence than administration of AL under identical conditions.

To address these questions, we compared the prevalence of NVP-R mutations following administration of single- or extended-dose NVP to subtype C infected Indian infants enrolled in the SWEN trial who became infected despite prophylaxis, and in whom the timing and mode of HIV infection were determined.

The prevalence of chemotherapy, timing of first administration, and number of courses were described.

In addition, we have documented the prevalence of a number of medication administration related policies, guidance and double-checking practices.

The reason for this difference is high prevalence of malaria in Bahir Dar city administration.

There had been concerns that, due to the high prevalence of HIV in these subjects, probiotic administration might cause sepsis due to the immunocompromised status.