Sentence examples for prevalence at which from inspiring English sources

We investigated how different criteria influence the frequency with which the "plateau phenomenon" is detected and the prevalence at which "false" plateau phenomena occurs during sub-maximal exercise.

Moreover, uncertainty exists about the threshold resistance prevalence at which indications should be withdrawn.

Rather, to question the prevalence at which routine screening of all pregnant women for HIV and, in particular, syphilis is no longer advisable and to describe the situation from a low prevalence, low resource setting.

The likelihood of individuals with classic MODY criteria having a mutation in HNF1A, HNF4A, or GCK is nearly 50% (3), a prevalence at which genetic testing for MODY would be predicted to be cost saving in our model.

The main reason to write this manuscript is not to explore risk factors but to question the prevalence at which syphilis testing is not viable for resource constrained settings.

With 10% HIV prevalence, the minimum prevalence at which WHO allows the use of sputum HIV testing [ 3], the corresponding proportions false-positive would be as high as 69%and75%5%, whereas they would still be 19%and25%5% at a very high prevalence of 50%.

The four parameters include the year the epidemic started, the force of infection which describes how quickly the prevalence trend will rise, the peak prevalence, and the rate at which prevalence declines over time.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDCC) received de-identified study data in aggregate, so multivariable regression techniques to adjust for co-factors beyond HIV prevalence at laboratories, which were related to pregnancy and false-positive HIV EIA test results, could not be performed.

In 2006, Uganda's Ministry of Health (MoH) estimated MC prevalence at 25%%, which was among the lowest in sub-Saharan Africa; however, the country's HIV prevalence at 6.5 % was among the highest in sub-Saharan Africa [ 13].

There were significant decreasing trends (p<.05) in overall rate, nosocomial rate and prevalence at admission which decreased from 0.78/1000 patient-days to 0.40, 0.53/1000 patient-days to 0.31 and 0.72/1000 admissions to 0.23, respectively.

In general, it is possible that the huge practice variation well documented in contemporary medicine [ 56- 61], can be, in part, due to individual differences in subjective judgments of disease prevalence and "thresholds" at which physicians act.