Not only has "why" become "how" but "why" no longer has any useful meaning, given that it presumes purpose for which there is no evidence.
But, in this regard, as I have argued that "why" questions are really "how" questions, would you also agree that all "why" questions have no meaning, as they presume "purpose" that may not exist?
The authors of the piece must be presumed to aim at even a higher purpose than the amusement of a very idle hour.
The prey choice strategy as a whole (i.e. not, for example, the Ache's specific, locally appropriate set of prey choices, but the general human prey choice strategy of which they are a manifestation) is also presumed for heuristic purposes to be an adaptation to conditions in the past that led to that strategy being selected for; these are the selection conditions for the strategy.
As expected, more RBC units were transfused in the liberal group; it must be presumed for resuscitation purposes that greater amounts of other intravenous crystalloids or colloids were required and used in the restrictive strategy cohort, although these data were not provided.
These theories presume a preexisting purpose or intent and rely on cognitive information-processing capability of an individual.
Laws like the Defense of Marriage Act that focus on a group long subjected to unfair discrimination, as gay people have been, should be presumed invalid unless lawmakers' purpose in adopting the law is shown to serve a real and compelling interest.
Here we presume a grand purpose, many years in the unfolding.
Soon after, he will begin what was presumed to be the real purpose of the trip: finding a solution to his pitching woes.
