Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Defrag, automated analysis excluding electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi -detected brEAdi -detectedthan 0.15 μV*s and pressure deflection trigger of 3.0 cm H2O, ignoring pressure-detected breaths of less than 1.5 cm H2O*s.
Initial inspiratory pressure was measured as the negative pressure deflection produced by the first inspiration attempt, whereas Pimax was taken as the most negative deflection produced by any inspiration attempt during airway occlusion [ 9, 23, 27].
Defragmentation, automated analysis with EAdi trigger of 0.5 μV excluding EAdi-detected breaths of less than 0.15 μV*s and pressure deflection trigger of 3.0 cm H2O ignoring pressure-detected breaths of less than 1.5 cm H2O*s.
Mean inspiratory esophageal pressure deflection was negative for all NAVA levels, whereas it was negative only for PSVlow and positive for PSVal and PSVhigh (P < 0.001 for all comparisons).
Similar(56)
This was conducted during continuous positive airway pressure verifying the absence of breathing, confirmed by the absence of esophageal pressure deflections (SmartCath Viasys, Palm Springs, CA, USA) while pCO2 was above 60 mmHg (verified by arterial blood gas analysis).
For all NAVA levels negative esophageal pressure deflections were observed during inspiration whereas this pattern was reversed during PSVal and PSVhigh.
Previous studies have shown that this maneuver accurately reflects esophageal pressure deflections during both voluntary [ 42] and phrenic nerve-stimulated diaphragm contractions in intubated subjects [ 5, 8].
The diaphragms were then subjected to high-pressure (0.7 7 MPa) and high temperature (500 K) tests to obtain the pressure-deflection curves.
The numerical solutions for the resistance curves, pressure vs. deflection, and NCOD were in good agreement with measurements.
The finite element model of the burst test with the AFB unloading material model predicted the general shape of the pressure versus deflection curve.
The scale of the systems is much larger than any presently operating, bringing challenges for designers in terms of available sub cooling, total pressure drop, deflection and mandatory remote maintenance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com