Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
All presented VS similarity functions that are based on the optimal assignment approach were developed at our department, and, therefore we are able to perform a fair comparison of the computation time.
Twenty (12%) of the 165 patients presented VS.
Similar(58)
Our experimental design generated one acuity measurement per participant for each of the following factors: chart type, viewing condition (left eye vs right eye vs binocular viewing) and blur (present vs absent).
The weak statistical interactions observed with GSTT1 present (vs. GSTT1 null) and with GSTZ1 CT/TT (vs. CC) were in a direction contrary to expectation, given what we observed for interactions with THMs [see Supplemental Material, Table 2A,B (doi:10.1289/ehp.1002206)].
First, we constructed a nomogram that consisted of age, ECOG PS (<2 vs ⩾2), Hb (<10 vs >10 g dl−1), LDH, visceral metastases (present vs absent), and lymph node metastases (present vs absent).
The following three variables were used for stratification: PS (0 1 vs 2), measurable lesion (present vs absent), and number of previous treatment regimens (1 vs 2 or more).
EPE (present vs absent), SVI (present vs absent) and surgical margins (positive vs negative) were treated as binary variables.
These included performance status (0 1 vs 2 3), liver involvement (present vs absent), lung involvement (present vs absent), adjuvant chemotherapy (received vs not received), LDH level (⩽normal vs >normal), oestrogen receptor status (present vs absent) and disease-free interval (⩽24 months vs >24 months) (Honig, 1996; Yamamoto et al, 1998).
Episodes were rated as more binge-like if a large amount of food was consumed over a short (vs. long) interval and when loss of control was present (vs. absent).
Easy Taxi is live in around 30 countries at present vs Uber's 67.
In the milliseconds to seconds range, time is perceived as a 'subjective present' (vs. 'time estimation') which inherently affects the perceptual structuring of the world [11], [13], [15] and thus provides crucial insights on perception.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com