Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Completed questionnaires from 1004 members of the public, 335 general practitioners, and 228 medical students are presented (responses rate>65%).
Similar(59)
Following the prompt, an aurally presented response that matched/mismatched expectations (e.g., nap/tap; noth/toth) was presented.
DIF analysis presented response bias for sex (items 4, 8, 11, 16, 20, 28 and 32) and age (item 17) and, for this reason, they were excluded.
Three studies presented response rate below 85% [ 13, 16, 17].
In this section I present responses to arguments from conceptual relativity that metaphysical realists might endorse and shall not try to distinguish between conceptual relativism and conceptual pluralism.
Table 2 presents responses to the specific knowledge questions.
To promote open disclosure, increase response volume, and ensure that all patients had an equal opportunity to present responses, we used a "round-robin" participation format.
Table 1 presents response rates by type of organization.
Table 2 presents response frequencies/proportions by respondent type.
Table 2 presents response rate by survey and district.
Results of descriptive analyses presenting response rate by demographic group are shown in Table 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com