Sentence examples for presented item from inspiring English sources

Table 4 shows the estimated expected log penalty per presented item based on the Gilula–Haberman approach.

For a discussion of interpretation of differences between estimated expected log penalties per presented item for different models, see Gilula and Haberman (1994).

Sequences of potentially infinite length are recursively processed by integrating the currently presented item and the recent map activation, as proposed in the SOMSD presented in (IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 14(3) (2003) 491).

For comparisons between IRT models, one can use the estimated expected log penalty per presented item that is given by begin{aligned} text {PE}=frac{-l(hat{varvec{beta }})}{sum _{i=1}^N W_i sum _{k=1}^p c(J_{ik})}, end{aligned} (5 where (l(hat{varvec{beta }})) is the log-likelihood of the measurement model and (c(J_{ik})) is the number of items in (J_{ik}).

Finally, we also restricted the analysis to the first presented item and contrasted the confidence of the group of people who gave an incorrect conflict response and the confidence of people who solved a no-conflict control problem first.

During delayed-discrimination tasks an item has to be discriminated from the previously presented item.

They then took three memory tests designed to elicit false recognition of presented items.

Response time score is taken from the mean response of each participant to the presented items.

One possible cause of DAT object recognition impairments could involve deficits in processing structural aspects of visually presented items.

Importantly, participants were instructed to focus on the nonword-likeness of presented items, not their word-likeness.

The negative affect scale also presented items with moderate discrimination and are evaluating respondents across the trait continuum; however, with much less precision.