Conformation snapshots of D3 unfolding are presented in reversed time order in Fig. 6.
For Group A, the obligatory VPs were presented in a timed order.
All sounds were presented in random order, 25 times each, for a total of 150 trials.
30 trails, with different time gaps and different car speeds, were presented in a randomized order: time gaps of 1 and 7 s were presented once, time gaps of 2 and 6 s were shown twice, and the time gaps of 3, 4, and 5 s were presented three times, making 15 trials, per one speed value.
Letters were presented in pseudorandomized order with a presentation time of 300 ms and an inter-stimulus interval of 1700 ms. Both task conditions were conducted three times each, resulting in three 30-s task segments for both paradigms.
Cases were presented in random order at different time points to prevent recall bias.
In most motion pictures, the story may be assumed to be presented in chronological order and in real time except when certain conventions are invoked, such as ellipsis, repetition for emphasis, flashbacks, or dream sequences.
In the SO condition, letters were presented in alphabetical order one at a time.
As it would be easier to learn information over repeated trials when stimuli are presented in the same order each time, and easier to recall learned items when there are no time restrictions, these two factors may have confounded our conclusions to some extent.
The foods were first presented in a descending order of time intervals (4 hours, 1 hour and 15 minutes) and later ascending (15 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours) order.
These conditions were presented in pseudorandomized order with no conditions being presented more than two times in a row.
