The results of Bin 12 for PPI-Indel1 and PPI-Indel2 (see Methods) are also presented in a ranked list in the Tables S1, S2, and S3.
Residue-wise contribution is obtained and presented in a ranked order for each complex, thus providing a ready resource of important residues for ligand binding.
If the user chooses query-by-example, experiments that are similar to the query experiment are retrieved, and up to 100 most similar ones are presented in a ranked list, in a decreasing order of similarity (Similarity is computed as 1 dissimilarity).
The results are presented in Spearman's rank correlation coefficient matrix and charts.
However, the results are typically presented in semi-quantitative "ranked list" or "categorical matrix" formats, which are certainly useful but not optimal for making business decisions.
Oftentimes, these are presented in forms of ranking lists, based on selected variables and their weighted importance, and they are based on analysis on data, for example, from Oxford Economics, Moody's Analytics, and the U.S. Census Bureau.
However, we considered relevant to infer how well the pipeline presented in this work ranks already known targets.
In an effort to characterize the nonsynonymous metabolic SNPs identified in CEN.PK113-7D CEN.PK113-7Dcal significance, Gene Ontology (GO) process categorization withperformed and presented in Figure 2 ranked according to statistical significance (p < 0.01).
The differences in mean urinary InAs%, MMA%, and DMA% between those in the highest and lowest tertiles of each dietary intake factor and blood micronutrient are presented in Table 3, ranked in order of the magnitude of the absolute differences, excluding those factors having a p-value > 0.2.
The results of these studies are presented in Table 1, ranked according to the estimated MIC. Clearly the study of Cleland et al. [ 9] with the highest baseline NDI does have the highest MIC (9.5), but in this study the MIC was reduced to 7.0 with a narrower definition of unchanged patients.
