Sentence examples for presentations pairs from inspiring English sources

The order of presentations (pairs with suprathreshold or subthreshold differences in the long axis) and the order of parallelepipeds within a pair (more or less oblong) were pseudorandomized within and across sessions, implying that the first and second members of pairs were longer an equal number of times.

These models included one regressor to model face presentations that were not followed by the scream, one regressor to model face presentations that were followed by the scream (pairing runs only), and two additional regressors that modelled startle probe delivery and scream presentations (pairing runs only) per run.

In Fig.  3b, for a better clarity of presentation pairs of samples authentic and counterfeit are connected with a line.

In children with definite or probable TB and a positive IFN-γ ELISpot at presentation, paired analysis of IFN-γ responses showed a statistically significant increase in IFN-γ responses to PPD at six months (p = 0.02), decrease in IFN-γ responses to ESAT-6 at two months (p = 0.01) and decrease in IFN-γ responses to CFP-10 at two (p = 0.03) and six months (p = 0.02).

Subsequent to the presentation of each display pair, subjects were required to discriminate the speed of the two displays.

The coefficient of voxel-value correlation, 0.32, indicated moderate correlation between this categorical comparison and PC 3. Corresponding to PC 26 was the categorical comparison discriminating the presentations of pairs which could not be distinguished, P1b and P2b.

To prevent participants from using non-numerical dimensions of the stimuli, in half of the presentations, the pairs of stimuli were matched for continuous variables (cumulative surface area, luminance, density, and overall space occupied by the arrays).

The paradigm consist of dichotic presentations of pairs of consonant vowel (CV-) syllables, i.e. two different syllables were simultaneously presented, one to the left and one to the right ear [ 57- 59].

The memory condition required the memorization of three pairs of unrelated elements, e.g., after the presentation of three pairs of objects: G T, U R, and W S, every subject was asked whether the presented pair of letters was shown before or not.

We thus pooled not across trials of the experiment, but across the ordinality of presentation for pairs: The number of times a pair is seen, from presentation 1, to a possible 11.

(In addition to choosing the artists he organized the Stripped/Dressed format of the presentations, which pair informal demonstrations with performances).