Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
From our experience, presentations are most effective if they are 60 minutes long for middle school (6th-8th girls) girls, and 90 minutes for high school (9th-12th girls) girls.
From our experience, presentations are most effective if they are 60 minutes long for middle school (6th-8th girls) girls, and 75 minutes for high school (9th-12th girls) girls.
Mixed hyper- and hypoactive presentations are most frequent and the transition from hyperactive to hypoactive delirium, stupor and coma can be seen as one of the ways of dying.
Similar(57)
Presentations were most commonly published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy followed by The American Journal of Sports Medicine.
Presentations were most common between 0800 and 1400, accounting for 35.8% of total presentations, but large numbers of presentations continued until midnight.
The level of evidence of the published study was not a significant predictor of the impact factor of the journal in which it was published (n.s).. Presentations were most commonly published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (24%) and The American Journal of Sports Medicine (22%).
Those patients experiencing the highest levels of acute pain during HZ presentation are most at risk of developing PHN [ 11].
While it is still unclear whether and under which circumstances visual presentation is most effective in risk communication (4, 5), we chose to present a reference class of 100 people, since some evidence was available for this (13 , 24.
Patients at intermediate or high risk for death or myocardial infarction at presentation were most likely to benefit from early angiography.
The labial mucosa or vermilion was affected in 17 (49%) patients, the tongue in 5, the hard palate and cheek mucosa in 4 each, the gingiva or alveolar mucosa in 3, and the floor of the mouth in 1. Clinical presentation was most often a raised lesion smaller than 20 mm.
Clinical presentation is most commonly with an abdominal mass.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com