Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
At the end of each presentation the subject had to indicate the number of the flashes seen.
In standard cases, if a subject does not know a given fact in one way that it does know in some other way, this can be explained by two modes of presentation: the subject knows the fact under one mode of presentation and does not know it under some other mode of presentation.
After target stimulus presentation, the subject was given an instruction to "speak" the recently heard stimulus.
Following hint presentation the subject had another 6 s to solve the problem.
Similar(56)
After stimuli presentation, the subjects indicate the location and order of the presented stimuli by clicking on a computer screen with a mouse.
with a 1/3 s rate in the same interface used for task (1) After stimuli presentation, the subjects indicate the location and order of the presented stimuli by clicking on a computer screen with a mouse.
"As a result of repeated presentation, the subjects developed enhanced sensitivity to the dots," he said.
After the presentation, the subjects had to repeat the sequence by pressing numbered buttons on the screen in the reverse order (7, 0, 3, 4 in the above example).
After stimuli presentation, the subjects indicated the digits and the order of the stimuli by pressing numbered buttons on the screen in the order they were presented.
After each successive bilateral visual presentation, the subjects had to indicate by a button press how many red deviants were present (right index finger = 2 targets, middle finger = 3 targets, or ring finger = 4 targets) for the attended side only.
This hypothesis predicts that, although at the group level there might be no significant retrieval of the 200 ms component of Si representation during outcome presentation, the subjects who did retrieve the 200 ms component of Si might have a positive preference for Si+ over Si−.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com