Sentence examples for presentation groups from inspiring English sources
ANCOVA controlling for Baseline indicated that the presentation groups were more likely to turn off classroom lights during both the intervention and follow-up.
Among the three presentation groups it was greatest in the group shown negatively framed information for 10 years and least in the group shown positively framed information.
There was no difference in the distribution of the elicited raw value scores (VAS and CRS) nor the RIS between the summary statistics presentation groups (Figure 6).
We compared the odds of a positive decision to take antihypertensives on the first decision for each group to the odds of a positive second decision for the pooled estimate for the other three presentation groups (Table 5).
The distribution of age, sex, country of residence, years of education, profession, numeracy, and salience score among the six presentation groups shows that the randomization process worked well, providing comparable groups (Table 2).
To make inferences about the response within each group and for the comparisons of groups we used dummy variable coding with reference parameterization for the presentation groups, i.e. directly estimating the difference in the effect between the presentation group and the reference group, i.e. negative framing for 10 years.
Instructional efficiency of the integrated presentation group was found to be higher than that of the separated presentation group.
You need to do presentation, group discussions, and face-to-face discussions with your professor.
No difference of GVBD percentage was observed between FSH short time priming group and FSH long time presentation group.
There was no significant difference in average inflammatory score at presentation (group A 17.85 ± 5.83; group B 18.18 ± 7.35; P = 0.243).
Perceivers were also better able to detect differences in personality and intelligence among those in the positive-self presentation group compared to those in the non self-presentation group.
