This discussion amongst diplomats in 1944 relates directly to present-day debates about when international law recognized the idea that a collective of far-flung individuals of varying seniority can be jointly held responsible for the commission of equally far-flung atrocities.
(A present-day debate about who the street was named after – a long-serving schoolmaster at King Edward's school, the owner of gun-barrel-maker Cooper & Turner, or a partner in a famous button-making firm, Hammond, Turner & Sons – seems to have been settled by Carl Chinn, chair of community history at the University of Birmingham, who is sure it was the latter).
Historians to the present day continue to debate whether the country has completely recovered from these two episodes.
The shared polymorphism in sister species may either be ancestral or derive from hybridization, and the accuracy of analytic methods used thus far to derive convincing evidence for the occurrence of present day hybridization is largely debated.
It is to no wonder that debates over possible futures involving emerging technologies are mostly grounded in debates over present day's controversial technologies [31]; thus, the new technology is implicitly (or explicitly) compared to an older one.
Representations of the Uptown Theatre and the eastern marshlands wink at present-day preservation debates that young people could join.
The iconographic interpretation has caused countless scholarly debates, which to the present day have not been entirely resolved.
The debate has continued right up until the present day, most recently through the publication of John Lauritsen's The Man Who Wrote Frankenstein (Pagan Press, 2007).
The debate between the two positions has continued to the present day, taking many different forms and having many important ramifications.
After providing an overview of global population projections and describing exactly what is at stake, this article reviews the evolution of the population and development debate and the resultant family planning policies from the 1960s to present day.
This debate has resulted in several different hypotheses regarding the interpretation of the present day landscape.
