The present commentary focuses on recent advances in technologies for the detection of occult metastatic cells in bone marrow in breast cancer patients.
The present commentary focuses on a recent publication from Steve Reed's laboratory that implicates defective cyclin proteolysis as an alternative mechanism of cyclin overexpression in breast cancer [ 3].
8 Instead of providing a detailed description of contemporary project examples with ethical dilemmas, the present commentary concentrates on basic principles which can be practically applied when industries and academic researchers plan to work together on individual projects.
Hermeneutical patience certainly is demanded of the reader, because more than half of the book presents commentaries on the doctrine of Purgatory from the late Middle Ages to the early seventeenth century.
The book presents commentaries on particular films and their social and urban relevance, offering contemporary criticisms of both film and urbanism from conflicting perspectives, and documenting examples of how to actively use the medium of film in the design of our cities, spaces and buildings.
In the present commentary, we reflect on how we can move forward in the management of severely bleeding trauma patients in the current environment.
At present we do not have data to substantiate the latter sentence, but we hope that the present commentary will stimulate adequate research on this vital issue for the battle against headache.
In the present commentary we focus our attention on a putative DNA helicase termed BACH1, which was recently shown to interact with BRCA1, and on another BRCA1-interacting protein known as BARD1 [ 22, 23, 24].
Two authors of the present commentary (K.L.E. and J.B). testified on 10 April 2008 before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions on the potential health impacts of climate change.
In the present commentary we provide the investigators' perspective on many of the issues that have been raised, the majority of which were carefully considered as the study was designed and conducted [ 12].
The present commentary intends to stimulate a debate on this subject by providing the background about new developments in animal modeling, by disputing suggested limitations of genetically engineered mice, and by discussing improvements but also ambiguous expectations on the authenticity of xenograft models to faithfully mimic the human disease.
