presence of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "presence of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a state of being or something that is present. For example, "The presence of the police deterred the perpetrator from committing the crime."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The presence of Carville, Pres.

The New Yorker

"The presence of the church".

The Economist

The presence of superior performance stung him.

The New Yorker

Aldo again signaled the presence of drugs.

The New York Times

"They are prolonging the presence of Assad".

The New York Times

There was the presence of an absence".

The New York Times - Books

And in the presence of dinosaurs?

The New York Times

Both confirmed the presence of child laborers.

The New York Times

The presence of death was constant, inescapable.

Independent

The presence of others?

The New York Times

Such presence of mind!

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "presence of" to clearly indicate the existence or availability of something. For example, "The presence of security cameras deterred the vandals."

Common error

While grammatically correct, avoid overuse of "presence of" in highly formal contexts. Sometimes, simpler phrasing like "existence" or "availability" can improve clarity and conciseness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "presence of" primarily functions as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It indicates the state of being present or the existence of something in a particular place or situation. Ludwig AI's analysis confirms that it's a standard grammatical construction.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

34%

Wiki

24%

Less common in

Academia

4%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "presence of" is a grammatically sound and versatile phrase used to indicate the existence or availability of something. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread usage across diverse contexts, including news, science, and general writing. While frequently employed, writers should be mindful of potential verbosity, especially in formal contexts where simpler alternatives like "existence of" or "availability of" might enhance clarity. Its neutral register makes it suitable for various communication styles, though careful consideration should be given to conciseness in highly formal or technical writing. As Ludwig's examples demonstrate, "presence of" serves a crucial function in conveying information about what exists or is located in a specific situation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

existence of

Focuses on the fact that something exists rather than its mere presence.

incidence of

Highlights the frequency or rate at which something occurs.

occurrence of

Emphasizes an event taking place, shifting focus from a state of being to an action.

availability of

Indicates that something is accessible or obtainable, suggesting a resource.

attendance at

Refers specifically to being present at an event or gathering.

appearance of

Highlights the act of becoming visible or noticeable.

location of

Specifies the exact place where something can be found.

involvement of

Indicates participation or inclusion in something.

emergence of

Highlights the process of something coming into being or becoming prominent.

stationing of

Emphasizes the act of placing or deploying something in a specific location.

FAQs

How can I use "presence of" in a sentence?

Use "presence of" to indicate that something exists or is located in a particular place. For instance, "The "presence of evidence" at the scene confirmed his alibi".

What are some alternatives to "presence of"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "existence of", "incidence of", or "availability of".

Is it better to use "presence of" or "existence of"?

Both phrases are correct, but "existence of" often implies a more fundamental or abstract state of being, while "presence of" can refer to a more immediate or observable condition.

When is it appropriate to use "presence of" in writing?

It is appropriate to use "presence of" when you want to highlight that something is in a specific location or state, or when its being there has an effect. Consider simpler phrasing for very formal or concise writing.