Sentence examples for preponderance of published from inspiring English sources

The evidence-based policy movement in various public policy issues and other areas of practice originated in the United Kingdom, according to the preponderance of published work, in the context of medical practices.

Since uPAR does not directly bind to FN, the preponderance of published data, including our own, allows the conclusion that MS 479 disrupts the existing interface between uPAR and the integrin and stops the signaling cascade.

Despite many efforts to change reporting practices in psychology (see, e.g., Wilkinson and Task Force on Statistical Inference, 1999), the preponderance of published articles still lack effect sizes.

These methodological deficiencies, perhaps operating in conjunction with the well-documented phenomenon of publication bias, have led to a preponderance of published trials that have received funding from for-profit entities and whose conclusions favour industry [ 7- 16].

These prior reviews have also suggested that the preponderance of published articles on STMMS, numbering in the hundreds, are reflective in nature and convey the emotional rewards, sense of renewal and adventure garnered by physicians in the course of their participation in STMMs [ 3, 5].

Despite research that has found that the accessibility to foods in the home is one of the most important determinants of eating behavior [ 16, 23], the preponderance of published studies focus on access to the retail food environment [ 3, 24- 36].

We are not aware of published use of the model for environmental stratified time series analyses, where the overwhelming preponderance is of conditional logistic analyses in a case crossover formulation.

Because of the preponderance of negative letters published in Calendar Letters, I fear that The Times may discontinue the Book Review section because so few write in its defense.

There was a preponderance of favourable statistical conclusions among published trials with 67% reporting results that favored a new treatment whereas 6% favoured the conventional treatment.

As a result, our systematic review of the Australian literature does not reflect a well-established body of knowledge based on rigorous and comprehensive evaluations but rather a preponderance of largely descriptive studies in the published literature.

The majority of recent papers published after 1970s [ 13, 24– 32] indicate a preponderance of men over women with KC while other studies published prior to 1970s and two recent studies reported the opposite [ 16, 33, 34].