Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(12)
Composite preparedness score.
Overall, response professionals have an above average preparedness score while laypeople exhibit slightly below average preparedness.
The mean anaphylaxis preparedness score was 2.39 points (SD 1.17).
We specified anaphylaxis preparedness score as the dependent variable.
The highest preparedness score for a country in 2008 was 59% and the lowest was 12%.
Final model constant for preparedness score α (95% CI) 5.64 (4.49–6.80); not significant at p<0.05.
Similar(48)
In addition to asking respondents to rate the importance of suggested barriers, we compared measures of ascription of responsibility and perceived self-efficacy to preparedness scores.
T-tests comparing the average preparedness scores (i.e., CP, planning, supplies, and action scores) of response professionals and laypeople reveal a lack of statistically significant difference between the average planning and supplies indicator scores of these two groups (Table 5).
For this group, profession had no impact on preparedness scores.
Linear regression was used to explore associations between funding and pandemic preparedness scores.
We found a positive association between preparedness scores and cumulative funding between 2006 and 2011 (R = 0.5, p < 0.01).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com