Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Studies with 125I-labelled eluates indicate that such preparations exhibit a variable, but appreciable, degree of non-specific binding to unrelated syngeneic tumour and normal tissues.
Similar(58)
The Ni-affinity-purified preparations exhibited a specific activity of 0.21 and 0.11 pkat/mg for the intracellular (rF6Hy) and the secreted (rF6Hys) constructs, respectively.
The A/chicken/Hong Kong/D-0947/2006 strain preparations exhibited a slightly higher chlorine demand, ≈1.5 mg/L after 1 min, compared with 1.0 mg/L for the A/WhooperSwan/Mongolia/244/2005 strain during the same time interval.
To test for endothelial responses, prior to construction of vasodilator dose response curves, acetylcholine (0.1 µM in 100 µL bolus) was added and only those preparations exhibiting a 50% reduction of the phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction were used.
As expected, this preparation exhibited a significant difference between the larger CS and smaller gas phase response (Fig. 7, Larynx).
As shown in Figure 3, the enzyme preparation exhibited a single protein band of approximately 18 kDa.
The most purified antigen preparation exhibited a highly selective capacity to inhibit in the cytotoxic assay and to bind, when labelled with 125I, to 2 specific antisera.
The plasmid preparations exhibit some heterogeneity as there is a variable amount of relaxed, open plasmid at time zero.
Various natural and synthetic surfactant preparations exhibit differences regarding the biochemical composition and biophysical properties.
Enteric coated PPI preparations exhibit delays in in vivo absorption and onset of antisecretory effects, which is not reflected by the rapid in vitro dissolution in compendial pH 6.8 phosphate buffer commonly used for assessment of these products.
The two bovine kidney preparations exhibit the highest degree of 6O-desulfation despite the fact that their initial D2S6 content is much lower than that of either murine kidney or murine liver HS.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com