Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Proponents of teleological theories of mental content can agree that no ought-claim follows from a function ascription without the addition of further premises (for discussion, see Jacob (2001)) and that functions are not prescriptive.
Similar(59)
Taking these considerations into account, purely normative, theoretical research on ideal premises (i.e. simplified, limited premises that basically allow for discussion and justification of principles, not real world actions) cannot be characterised as being translational in its own right.
Were there premises for involuntary treatment?
Our study supports the premise that increased knowledge and opportunity for discussion is associated with acceptance of less restrictive consent models.
Our study also supports the premise that increased knowledge and opportunity for discussion is associated with acceptance of less restrictive consent models.
Up for discussion?
Pause for discussion.
19.2, for discussion.
For discussion see Wall (forthcoming).
See King [2009a] for discussion.
(For discussion, see Rea 2006).
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com