Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
There is a positive trend between a GP premises accessibility and deprivation decile with the highest access in the most deprived areas; however, when compared with community pharmacy accessibility, access to a GP premises is lower across all deprivation deciles; this trend was also observed for urban and town and fringe areas, but not rural areas.
GP premises accessibility was compared with community pharmacy accessibility using previously reported data, 11 and shows for GP premises, access is lower than community pharmacies across all deprivation deciles, but particularly in the least deprived areas (figure 3).
There is a significant positive association between community pharmacy accessibility and GP premises accessibility.
The domain 'infrastructure' addresses aspects of the premises, accessibility of the practice and medical equipment.
Spatial inequalities, therefore, in terms of GP premises accessibility, are much more significant in urban areas.
Similar(52)
However, a 1% increase in overall community pharmacy access only corresponds to 0.86% increase in GP premises access, which is an indication of greater community pharmacy accessibility.
We note that physical access is not limited to getting to and getting into premises and that accessibility of examining space and equipment are also important.
The calculations are based on the premise that the accessibility of the pore volume is controlled by capillarity.
The results of this study support the premise that the accessibility of childbirth-related health technology plays a role in avoidable maternal and newborn harm.
However, despite this potential, and given the wider issues of healthcare access as a social determinant of health, it is not known how the accessibility of GP premises compares with the accessibility of community pharmacies in England.
They should be encouraged to reflect on and improve the accessibility of their premises.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com