Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The premise appeared to be "let's kill Suarez".
In the learning phase of the reasoning condition, participants had to integrate the presented information from three premises, where the first two were not related until the third premise appeared (A > B was followed by C > D and in the end by B > C).
Similar(58)
Although the premise appears to have been wrong, the Europeans have, so far, merely held up negotiations on a new trade and co-operation agreement.
But now that its premise appears to be coming true, more gradually and not so dramatically, I am less convinced of the direction its prophetic powers took.
Given the definition of ultimacy (as given in section 2.2 above), the second premise appears to be an analytic truth.
Labels aside, several versions of the premise appear in the literature, and they can differ in strength.
A hidden premise appears to be present in the first excerpt, using a contrastive expression: (12) Et cette citoyenneté ne doit pas être opposée à la citoyenneté française.
Moreover its premises appear true.
On a first read the Disfranchisement Premises appear to presuppose the conclusion they aim to show.
Since the proof is valid and its other premises appear unexceptionable, the argument from omnipotence seems sound.
Finally, even ignoring the problems I have uncovered, two of the original premises appear fundamentally flawed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com