prejudicial implication

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "prejudicial implication" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to discuss an implication that may cause harm or bias against someone or something. Example: "The report contained a prejudicial implication that could damage the reputation of the accused."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

This carried a prejudicial implication that this was not true of the remaining four.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

This implication derives from his claim that it is "crucial to racial discrimination … that the prejudicial judgments it involves are not just the idiosyncratic attitudes of a particular agent but are widely shared in the society in question and commonly expressed and acted on in ways that have serious consequences" (2008: 73 74).

SEP

"Such articles are irrelevant, prejudicial and confusing.

The New York Times

Using it would be prejudicial, they contend.

The New York Times - Sports

The "fitness removal" could appear prejudicial.

The New York Times

Prosecutors argued the information would be prejudicial.

The Guardian

I will not be prejudicial about people.

The Guardian - Opinion

Is this inclusive or is it prejudicial?

The New York Times

I'm sick of these prejudicial Libs.

The New Yorker

We become more contemptuous and prejudicial.

The Guardian

"It's not prejudicial or anything like that," he said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "prejudicial implication", ensure the context clearly demonstrates the unfair bias or potential harm caused by the implied meaning. Provide specific examples to support your claim.

Common error

Avoid using "prejudicial implication" when the bias is merely perceived or subjective. The implication should have a clear and demonstrable potential for unfair harm or disadvantage.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "prejudicial implication" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "prejudicial" modifies the noun "implication". It describes an implication that carries a biased or unfair judgment. Ludwig indicates that this phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "prejudicial implication" refers to an inference or suggestion that carries an unfair or biased judgment. Ludwig confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and usable, though it is relatively rare. The phrase appears in both news media and scientific contexts, indicating a neutral register. When using "prejudicial implication", ensure that the context clearly demonstrates the bias and its potential for harm. Alternatives such as "biased insinuation" or "unfair inference" may be used to convey similar meanings with slightly different nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

biased insinuation

Replaces "implication" with "insinuation", emphasizing a subtle and often negative suggestion that is unfairly prejudiced.

unfair inference

Replaces "prejudicial" with "unfair", focusing on the injustice of the inference, and "implication" with "inference" for a more direct statement.

discriminatory suggestion

Replaces "prejudicial" with "discriminatory", highlighting the bias against a particular group, and "implication" with "suggestion" for a softer tone.

biased undertone

Shifts from a direct implication to a more subtle "undertone", suggesting a less explicit but still present bias.

harmful suggestion

Focuses on the negative consequences of the suggestion, replacing "prejudicial" with "harmful" and "implication" with "suggestion".

slanted inference

Uses "slanted" to describe the bias, suggesting a skewed or distorted perspective, with "inference" replacing "implication".

skewed deduction

Similar to "slanted inference", but uses "deduction" to imply a conclusion reached through biased reasoning.

unjustified conclusion

Highlights the lack of justification for the conclusion, implying it is based on prejudice rather than evidence.

loaded subtext

Emphasizes the hidden, often biased meaning beneath the surface, using "loaded" and "subtext".

partisan assumption

Indicates that the assumption is based on a particular bias or allegiance, making it potentially unfair.

FAQs

How can "prejudicial implication" affect legal proceedings?

A "prejudicial implication" in legal contexts can unfairly influence the jury or judge, potentially leading to a biased outcome. It's crucial to identify and address such implications to ensure a fair trial.

What's the difference between a "prejudicial implication" and a direct statement of bias?

A "prejudicial implication" is an indirect suggestion of bias, while a direct statement explicitly expresses prejudice. The former is often more subtle but can be equally damaging.

When is it appropriate to use the term "prejudicial implication" in academic writing?

Use "prejudicial implication" in academic writing when analyzing texts or arguments that contain subtle but potentially harmful biases. Ensure your analysis is supported by evidence from the source material.

What are some alternatives to "prejudicial implication" that still convey a sense of bias or unfairness?

You can use alternatives like "biased insinuation", "unfair inference", or "discriminatory suggestion" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.