prejudicial effect

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "prejudicial effect" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal or formal contexts to describe an impact that is harmful or detrimental to a party's case or position. Example: "The court must consider whether the evidence presented has a prejudicial effect on the jury's perception of the defendant."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

34 human-written examples

The trial court is the appropriate forum to consider the possible prejudicial effect of the error.

Cornell University

Finally, Rule 403 suggests that the judge may exclude evidence if its likely prejudicial effect outweighs itsprobative value.

Harvard University

4 The prejudicial effect of a failure to do so, however, can normally be determined by a post-trial hearing.

Cornell University

Finally, Rule 403 suggests that the judge may exclude evidence if its likely prejudicial effect outweighs its probative value.

Harvard University

The exception for errors as to which the prejudicial effect cannot be measured with precision requires closer consideration.

Cornell University

Finally, Rule 403 suggests that the judge must exclude evidence if its likely prejudicial effect outweighs its probative value.

Harvard University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

26 human-written examples

In addition, students will suffer no adverse or prejudicial effects because they have made use of these provisions.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

And fans of Mecca Cola and Iran's Zam Zam Cola have found a way around Coke's American origins, but may not have considered its prejudicial effects on health.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

He included consideration of the defendant's failure to assert his right in the cause-of-delay category, and he thought the length of delay was relevant primarily to the reasons for delay and its prejudicial effects.

Cornell University

716, 723, 93 L.Ed. 790: 'The naive assumption that prejudicial effects can be overcome by instructions to the jury, cf. Blumenthal v. United States, 332 U.S. 535 (559), 559, 68 S.Ct.

Cornell University

Although not the case here, an accused may well be deterred from testifying on the voluntariness issue when the jury is present because of his vulnerability to impeachment by proof of prior convictions and broad cross-examination, both of whose prejudicial effects are familiar.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal or judicial proceedings, use "prejudicial effect" to describe evidence or actions that could unfairly sway a jury or judge.

Common error

Avoid using "prejudicial effect" in casual conversation or informal writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "harmful impact" or "negative consequence" to maintain clarity and appropriateness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "prejudicial effect" functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the object of a verb or preposition. It describes a specific type of impact that is unfairly detrimental, particularly in legal or evaluative contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and commonly employed.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Academia

35%

News & Media

35%

Science

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "prejudicial effect" is a noun phrase primarily used in formal contexts, such as legal, academic, and scientific settings. It describes a negative impact that introduces bias or compromises fairness. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for use in written English. Its function is to express concern or assessment regarding a negative influence. It is important to consider simpler alternatives like "harmful impact" or "negative consequence" in less formal scenarios. Remember, the frequency of occurrence is considered common according to Ludwig.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

prejudicial consequence

Maintains "prejudicial" but uses "consequence" instead of "effect".

harmful influence

Focuses on the negative impact as an influence, rather than a direct effect.

detrimental impact

Replaces "effect" with "impact", emphasizing the force of the negative consequence.

adverse consequence

Shifts the focus to the outcome being negative.

negative repercussions

Highlights the aftereffects or indirect results of something.

damaging outcome

Emphasizes that the result is harmful or destructive.

unfavorable result

Generalizes the negative impact to simply being not favorable.

unjust influence

Focuses on unfair bias

biased impact

Expresses that something is skewed toward one side.

inequitable outcome

Signifies a lack of fairness in the end result.

FAQs

How is "prejudicial effect" typically used in legal contexts?

In legal contexts, "prejudicial effect" refers to the potential of evidence or testimony to unfairly influence a jury's decision. Judges must weigh the probative value of evidence against its potential for creating unfair prejudice.

What is the difference between "harmful effect" and "prejudicial effect"?

"Harmful effect" is a general term for any negative impact, while "prejudicial effect" specifically implies unfair bias or damage, particularly in a legal setting. Prejudicial suggests the potential to impede a fair decision.

What are some synonyms for "prejudicial effect" that can be used in less formal writing?

In less formal contexts, consider using phrases like "negative consequence", "detrimental impact", or "harmful influence" for similar meanings without the legal connotations.

How does Rule 403 relate to the concept of "prejudicial effect" in court?

Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows a judge to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury. This rule directly addresses the "prejudicial effect" of evidence.