Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Because our sample was predominantly composed of families with lower parental education and income, we preferred the test with the lower floor.
Similar(59)
In terms of preference, a majority of participants (97.2%, 106/109) preferred the multiplex test to conventional testing and would recommend it to others (99.1%, 108/109).
In response to item 18, asking students whether they preferred the automated testing station to an IL test, 55%% of the students either strongly or certainly agreed, 25%% agreed, 15%% somewhat agreed, and 5%% hardly agreed.
These courts had rejected the subjective test applied by the majority in Liversidge, preferring the objective test applied by Lord Atkin in his dissenting judgment.
A majority (87%) preferred the oral fluid OraQuick test for first time HIV testing and for re-testing, a majority (60%) chose the OraQuick oral test.
Humanitarian groups much prefer the second test, governments are generally more comfortable with the first.
We prefer the Papanicolaou test, however, because more information, such as the grade of the dysplastic cells, can be obtained; the sensitivities of the Papanicolaou and HC II tests were similar.
Similarly, if potential harms such as impotence/incontinence, or the chance of diagnosis were most important, then we might expect men to prefer the unlabelled test option that described no screening.
Clinicians and patients may prefer the HbA1c test, as there is no requirement for fasting or multiple blood draws, there is a threshold level associated with retinopathy and cardiovascular mortality [ 29], and it can be used to guide treatment decisions in the management of diabetes.
However, your doctor may still prefer the PPD test due to the cost and availability.
[10], [11], [12] There may be several reasons why our participants preferred the oral fluid-based test: less discomfort, less pain, greater cultural acceptability of giving oral fluid than blood specimens, and novelty of the test.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com