Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
These loci are typically dispersed throughout the genome, but in some teleost species a few of them might be located on a preferential pair of (sex) chromosomes.
These loci are typically dispersed throughout the genome, but in some species a few of them might be located on a preferential pair of chromosomes.
The existence of preferential pair associations in animal systems influences the likelihood of ecologically important processes, such as mate choice and sexual selection, cooperation including social grooming and cooperative foraging, and social learning, which is a major contributor to within-group behavioural adaptation over generations (Coussi-Korbel and Fragaszy 1995).
Similar(57)
To further assess the degree to which homologous chromosomes preferentially pair, we calculated the preferential pairing rate, p, which is a measure of how often homologous chromosomes pair with one another, rather than with their homeologous counterparts (Sybenga 1994).
The binomial tests, replicated G-test, and preferential pairing rate all suggest that although chromosomes may often preferentially pair with their homologous counterpart, it is not a strict association.
Autotetraploid genomes are derived from a single species (Brownfield and Köhler 2011) and generally show no pairing preference among the four homologous chromosomes, although again preferential pairing might occur (R. Wu et al. 2001).
Such preferential pairing interactions between homologous transgenes have also been observed in Arabidopsis by fluorescent chromatin tagging experiments [45].
These cysteine-modified receptors retain their function and lead to preferential pairing, thus interfering with heterologous chain pairing between introduced and endogenous receptors [51].
The TCR repertoire of NKT cells is further restricted by the preferential pairing of TCRAV24-AJ18 with polyclonal TCRBV11 transcripts that use diverse TCRBJ gene segments and complementarity determining regions 3 (CDR3).
The preferential pairing rate (p) can vary from 0 to ⅔.
Combining this information with the preferential pairing results (number of LGs in repulsion) showed that HG3 had an average difference ratio of 0.13 and no preferential pairing, whilst HG6 had a ratio of 0.86 with 7 LGs involved in pairing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com