Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
In this paper we deal with the problem of identifying preferential links in the projected network.
This is not true for the adjacency network, and shows that the statistically validated networks are able to identify the many preferential links inside communities and the few preferential links bridging different communities of organisms.
We argue that these preferential links carry relevant information about the structure and organization of the system.
Thus the entire set is covered and the additional preferential links provide relations among the groups already observed in the Bonferroni network.
When one constructs a projected network with nodes from only one set, the system heterogeneity makes it very difficult to discriminate preferential links from links which are consistent with a random null hypothesis taking into account the heterogeneity of the system.
Compared to classical methods [ 28], these first steps proved useful in illustrating the genetic relationship, and identifying clusters of individuals as well as agents acting as preferential links or sources in the metapopulation system of a threatened seagrass.
Similar(52)
We study the small world network, a model of preferential linking structure, and the classical Erdős Renyi random graph as particular examples of network topologies.
While the growth and the preferential attachment of incoming nodes assure an emergence of such networks according to the Barabási Albert model, it is argued here that the preferential linking condition needs not to be a principal rule.
Specifically we use the term preferential link to indicate a link whose presence in the projected network cannot be explained in terms of random co-occurrence of neighbors in the bipartite system.
Preferential linking can counterbalance it, and the fixation probability can be much higher than observed for a static network.
Thus higher probability of preferential linking can lead to cooperation in cases, where otherwise cooperation cannot be attained.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com