We designed our queuing game to disentangle motivations of outcome-oriented egoistic preferences, outcome-oriented distributional (inequality aversion) preferences and outcome-independent procedural preferences.
Measuring individuals' preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction is gaining increasingly importance in health economics.
It was also excluded because it could not be separated from preferences, outcomes, satisfaction, and experiences.
The new classification system includes patient- and person-reported preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction related to healthcare and health outcomes.
Moreover, the most constitutive methods to measure these four categories – preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – have been described in this article.
The various patient- and person-reported constructs can be classified into four categories: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction, as shown in Fig. 1.
To bridge this gap the RHO Group presents a comprehensible and well-justified classification of patient- and person-reports of preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction in the healthcare setting.
Although there is a movement towards involving the client in healthcare policy-making, systematic and explicit consideration of research evidence on patient- and person-reported preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction in healthcare policy decisions seems to be still limited [1].
Although the constructs are interrelated and interdependent, the objective of the new classification of preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction was to distinguish between the different concepts rather than illustrate all possible associations.
The primary outcome measures were the Parkinson's disease questionnaire-39, the Parkinson activity scale, and a patient preference outcome scale (PPOS).
