Sentence examples for preference table from inspiring English sources

In M. domestica on the basis of individual binomial z scores nine opossums were classified as left-forelimb preferent, nine opossums ― as right-forelimb preferent and eight ― did not show significant preference (Table  1).

In P. breviceps the distribution of individual forelimb preferences for feeding on non-living food differed significantly from chance (χ2 = 6.65, P = 0.036), with 11 left-forelimb preferent sugar gliders, five right-forelimb preferent subjects, and seven subjects which had no significant preference (Table  2).

Most generic and breast cancer-specific QL variables were found to be related to treatment preference (Table 5 > -wrap-foot>): patients with a more favourable QL preferred to have BCT.

Of the patients with a preference for MT, 85% decided to have MT. Of 22 patients who felt unsure about their treatment preference, 15 (68%) decided to undergo BCT and four (18%) MT. Of socio-demographic variables, age was the only one found to be related to treatment preference (Table 4 > -wrap-foot>); younger patients were more likely to prefer BCT.

The comparison numerical ratings are given in Table 2, which is known as the Saaty preference table.

While in path preference table, each entry for a destination is associated with a list of neighbor nodes.

To balance the samples, we attributed these 11 to group 1, which resulted in 108 samples in group 1 and 128 in group 2. Besides, using ANOVA, we analyzed scores in ecological product preference (Tables 11 and 12).

The herders categorised forage plants into desirability classes (i.e. 'very desirable'desirableble'partlytly desirable'undesirablebased based on livestock preferences (Table 3).

Based on the decision makers' preferences, Table 7 gives the evaluation table as a list of values in rows and columns that allow the analyst to identify the performance of relationships between sets of rules and measures.

The absolute risk reduction of antibiotic administration varies between 11% and 72% across these studies compared with "usual care" based on local recommendations and physicians' judgment and preferences (Table 2).

There were no significant differences of pain scores measured during the investigation the patients were allocated to (data from van Dongen et al. [9]) with regard to their postexamination preferences (Table 2).