Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
First, as stated above, the residual systematic variance in preference ratings was due to preferable ground colors (9.3%), preferable figural colors (4.7%), and large differences in lightness (4.5%).
Although pairs with highly contrastive hues are generally judged to be neither preferable nor harmonious, figural color preference ratings increase as hue contrast with the background increases.
The best fitting model explained 53.5% of the variance in pair preference ratings, showing that more preferred pairs contained cooler colors that were similar in hue and contrasting in Munsell value (lightness).
The results showed that moderately dense scenes received the highest preference ratings.
The addition of various types of commercial development to the settings caused preference ratings to plummet.
The lowest realism and preference ratings are given to visualizations showing terrain only combined with speech.
Overall, ECAs received higher preference ratings than crops or high-intensity grassland.
In addition, the seasonal stage of a landscape element strongly influenced preference ratings.
However, the addition of trees to the commercial development scenes increased preference ratings substantially.
A basic requirement is that preference ratings are unaffected by the quality of the auralizations.
The preference ratings may be specified in an imprecise manner by using ordinal values or linguistic terms.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com