Sentence examples for preference processes from inspiring English sources

First, as the preference processes leading to this confounding are likely to be influenced by a range of sociodemographic characteristics (Frank et al. 2007), we included these factors as covariates in our analyses to adjust (at least partly) for such confounding.

Hence, a major challenge is to focus on the psychological food preference learning processes to induce a shift from high to low calorie dense foods.

When appropriate antimicrobial therapy is administered, CRRT within 48 hours and intra-abdominal source of infection were associated with increased hospital mortality after accounting for preference and processes of care.

How can psychological food preference learning processes be exploited to induce a shift from high to low calorie dense foods? Figure 2 summarizes the three main routes taken in the idea generation phase, building on the assumption that adequate regulation of food intake requires presence of both satiating physiological and psychological triggers.

Modern agriculture, as well as our carefully created preference for processed over fresh food, has pushed us in the opposite direction, toward uniformity.

This models, for example, settings where agents are distributed and have privacy issues, or where there is an ongoing preference elicitation process.

In particular the theoretical aspects of the individual, instead of user group (aggregate), path choice modelling used to support path choice set individuation, path utility calculation and user preference learning process are defined.

LL individuals showed a marked preference to process positive affective materials and avoid negative affective materials.

Coloring highlighted the positive and negative outcomes to facilitate the preference formation process.

Some investigators have excluded the responses of individuals who did not appear to understand the preference testing process [ 13, 39, 40], and others have developed techniques to detect and minimize inconsistencies during multiple preference measurements in the same subject [ 41].

Instead, the preference uptake process pre-ordered to the operations of MAV/CVN represents the shortest decision chain possible by collapsing national, regional and provincial decision-making into two dedicated and slightly differently focused coordination fora: The Safeguard Commission and the Committee for Coordination and Control.