Suggestions(2)
Exact(6)
Women were categorized as non-drinkers, past drinkers, infrequent drinkers and drinkers by preference of alcohol type (i.e. those who preferred wine, beer, hard liquor, or who had no strong preference).
In a study of 31,785 men and women in Denmark, Høidrup et al. [ 19] assessed preference of alcohol type among current alcohol consumers and found that those who preferred wine had a reduced risk of hip fracture compared to those who preferred beer or liquor.
Also, preference of alcohol type was assigned based on reported alcohol consumption and on the food frequency questionnaire.
Preference of alcohol type was defined at baseline for each participant and does not capture lifetime consumption pattern, however, data from follow up assessments of beer, wine and hard liquor consumption suggest that preference does not change greatly.
An alternative model that made use of indicators for each type of alcohol allowed investigation of associations between types of alcohol and risk of hip fracture as opposed to preference of alcohol type.
Preference of alcohol type was associated with hip fracture; women who preferentially consumed wine had a lower risk of hip fracture compared to non-drinkers, past drinkers, and those with other alcohol preferences.
Similar(54)
This work provides a protein engineering approach to modify the substrate stereo-preference of alcohol dehydrogenase and a promising enzyme for cofactor regeneration in chiral catalysis.
This is the first study to examine the effect of risk preference on alcohol consumption in the context of a demand function.
This study estimates the direct impact of risk preference on alcohol demand and also explores how risk preference affects the price elasticity of demand.
cThe multivariate relative risk model using standard Poisson regression analysis adjusted for age, dietary preference, amount of alcohol drinking, body mass index, employment and fasting blood sugar as appropriate.
Broken rice is the cheapest and is, therefore, the rice of preference for alcohol making.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com