The overall degree of agreement was calculated by counting the difference and similarity scores for each preference, calculating the percentage of similarity for each preference and calculating the mean percentage of similarity with the preferences.
Aalto is examined as a subject whose actions were informed by the intellectual ideas and social situations around him as well as an agent motivated by personal preferences, calculated choices, even limitations.
After 3 min, larvae were counted and a preference score calculated as: (1) Preference = (#AM − #OCT /#Total.
Two-bottle preference was calculated as the ratio: preference for 1 = number of licks on bottle 1/(number of licks on bottle 1+number of licks on bottle 2) and expressed as percentage values, with 50% representing the indifference ratio (referred to as isopreference in the 'Results' section).
After 24 h, the volumes of sucrose solution and water consumed were recorded, and the sucrose preference was calculated using the following formula: Sucrose preference = sucrose consumption/(water consumption + sucrose consumption) × 100%.
Sucrose preference was calculated according to the formula: percentage of preference = (sucrose intake/total intake) × 100.
This reversal of preference was reflected in a large negative value of the preference score, calculated as the percentage of time spent in the initially preferred chamber minus the percentage of time spent in the initially non-preferred chamber during the STM test (or other phase of the experiment).
Grid preference was calculated as the ratio of use to availability [19], where a value of >1 indicated a preference and <1 indicated avoidance of an area.
Sucrose preference was calculated as a percentage (100 × volume of sucrose consumed/total volume consumed (sucrose and water)) and was averaged over 2 days of testing.
