Sentence examples for preference assay from inspiring English sources

The present study was designed to evaluate effects of l-THP on reward of oxycodone using conditioned place preference assay.

Data for the preference assay represent two trials which were not significantly different and were pooled for the subsequent analysis.

Therefore, we designed a modified two-choice preference assay similar to that described by Smith et al. [14] that includes two identical food containers equidistantly positioned in each activity box (Fig. 1A).

Each preference assay was replicated three times and scored as the percentage of nematodes found in or adjacent to the test strain relative to the number of nematodes in or adjacent to E. coli.

This suggests that MDI queen mandibular gland extracts have additional compounds that synergize with 9-ODA and 9-HDA to make these extracts more attractive in a preference assay and that the relative proportions of the entire gland chemical profile affect the retinue response.

The conditioned preference assay further demonstrates that flies find ethanol intoxication rewarding (Kaun et al. 2011).

MDI queens elicited a stronger retinue than SDI queens in natural colony conditions, and their mandibular gland extracts were more attractive in preference assays with caged worker bees.

Line J14, showing the highest inhibition of PPO enzymatic activity among the transgenic lines [10] was selected for the mice odor preference assays.

Taking advantage of two well established neuroscience paradigms, the "open field test" and the "nose-poking preference test", we performed experiments where mice exploration behavior was monitored in preference assays on the basis of olfaction alone.

Therefore, we used two neuroscience paradigms, the "open field test" [13], [14] and the "nose-poking preference test" [2], [11], and performed experiments where mice exploration behavior was monitored in preference assays on the basis of olfaction alone.

Marines spent less time schooling overall in the stimulus preference assays when compared with the model school alone (no choice, average time schooling = 4.2±0.2 min; moving plant assay, average time with both stimuli = 2.4±0.5 min; stationary plant assay, average time with both stimuli = 2±0.4 min).