Since this position was in opposition to the views of the orthodox Neo-Confucians, and since it represented a new, predominantly materialistic opposition to the Neo-Confucian tradition, it set the stage for the ideological struggles which took place during the last Chinese dynasty.
But hers is not an entirely materialistic view.
With Claude, it's a much more materialistic view.
The less materialistic view is what Jasanoff is trying to avoid.
Denis Diderot, Pierre-Jean-Georges Pierre-Jean-Georges Pierre-Jean-Georges Cabanispandists, espoused a dynamic, materialistic view of nature (not unlike that of Straton), which was later adapted by 19th-century evolutionist philosophers.
When I ask them to define success, there are shades of an article I've brought with me, in which a Polish social psychologist rather sniffily sums up young Poles as "predominantly materialistic hedonists".
You can see why Jasanoff didn't quote the amendment: "If you prefer a less materialistic view, I am a sort of fate".
This book helps to overcome the outdated economists' way of thinking that postulates 'More is Better than Less.' The authors do that in a substantial way, showing alternatives to this materialistic view, making their book a fascinating experience to read.
Evolutionary reasoning has actually influenced human thinking from biology to the philosophy of science, providing a materialistic view to explain the living world.
Thus materialism, as the belief in "material, self-existent things" is thoroughly undermined: the "consistent Materialistic view thus changes around, therefore, into a consistently idealistic view" (Lange 1873 75, 3 215, 223).
In view of this let us consider also the possibility of survival given some form of materialism.[2] What are the prospects for survival on a materialistic view of persons?
