Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Publications examining the clinical usefulness of NSE or S-100B as a prognostic predictor in two outcome groups were reviewed.
Five studies [ 17, 18, 26, 29, 30] investigated the clinical usefulness of NSE and/or S-100B as a prognostic predictor in two outcome groups, 'return to independent daily life' and 'no return to independent daily life'.
Sixteen studies [ 16, 21- 25, 27, 28, 28, 31- 39] investigated the clinical usefulness of NSE and/or S-100B as a prognostic predictor in two outcome groups, 'regained consciousness' and 'remained comatose'.
Publications examining the clinical usefulness of NSE or S-100B as a prognostic predictor in two outcome groups, 'favorable outcome' and 'poor outcome', were reviewed, with case reports excluded at this stage.
Similar(56)
Because allergenic proteins had higher sequence similarities within categories, we also carried out the predictor in six major sub-sets in which higher accuracy was obtained.
We selected these ten peptides as candidate predictors in two separate logistic regression models for binary responses between MPM and HD or MPM and NSCLC.
These variables were included as predictors in two separate linear regression models, with the WOMAC total score and FJS-12 as the dependant variables.
Figure 1 represents the illustrative example of the disorder evaluation by PONDR®-VLXT and PONDR®-VSL2 predictors in two unrelated proteins.
FVC and FEV1/FVC were entered as predictors in two separate full models because the use of FVC in defining FEV1/FVC results in multicollinearity if both are entered together as predictors in the same model [ 11].
In addition to these considerations, we kept the total complexity the same in all configurations in order to provide a fair comparison of performance such that the order of fullband predictor filter was 48 while the order of predictor filters in two and four-subband implementations were 24 and 12, respectively, in all simulations.
The criterion variables were regressed on the predictor variables in two separate analyses.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com