Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In this study of the degree of completeness and positive predictive value of registration in the Danish National Vascular Registry of the surgical procedures embolectomy in the brachial and in the radial or ulnar artery, we found that the positive predictive value of the procedure coding was high (>90%).
Similar(59)
For these patients, results for the catheter based procedure were imputed, and were mostly positive (range 65-77% across imputations), which accords with a reduced positive predictive value of the CT based procedure.
Results for catheter based coronary angiography were imputed for these patients, and were mostly negative (range 97-98.4% across the multiple imputations), which accords with the high negative predictive value of the CT based procedure.
Moreover, SISCOM elevates the predictive value of the surgical work-up procedure to preoperatively estimate chances of good surgical outcome [7 10].
This is the negative predictive value of the sentinel node biopsy procedure and is of great value to surgeons when they counsel patients after a negative sentinel node biopsy procedure, but it is still not the false-negative rate.
To evaluate completeness and positive predictive value of the Danish National Vascular Registry regarding registration of the surgical procedures: embolectomy of brachial, ulnar, or radial artery.
Conclusion: The predictive value of the TMT is most effective and very useful because the TMT is a short and economical procedure.
Therefore, the predictive value of the tests identifying the intra-oesophageal presence of gastric reflux during the qualification for the AR procedures is low.
Start with the predictive value of the Virginia and New Jersey victories: there is none.
Positive predictive value was relatively not high but negative predictive value of the test was high.
The average positive predictive value of the 7 features resulted 54% while the average negative predictive value 85%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com