To demonstrate our approach, we confronted its predictions with well-studied data.
Based on our recently published results, we were able to improve resistance prediction with well chosen descriptors and classifier ensembles.
Experiment 2 tested the predictions with another well-studied reasoning task, the conjunction fallacy [23], to examine the generality of the findings.
Similarly, while Twi binding is predicted via ChIP in [34], there are no significant predictions in [35]; but again lower-significance predictions from the supplementary data agree with our predictions as well as with the ChIP results from [34].
Several researchers have shown that such predictions correlate well with experiments in specimens with well characterized residual stress fields.
Model predictions fit well with independent data.
The model predictions agree well with experiments.
These predictions agree well with experimental observations.
Numerical predictions compare well with experimental observations.
Analytical predictions agree well with measured values.
The predictions agree well with the MSM simulations.
