Many of these predictions, which indicate increases between four to ten times the pre-disturbance estimates, are based on large-scale catchment modelling that make some critical assumptions about pre-disturbance erosion rates and/or sediment delivery ratios.
A comparison of the measurements is made with analytical predictions, which indicates that the experimentally measured deflections agree well with predictions employing both the inscribing and circumscribing yield loci.
The experimental results are plotted in principal strain space and show reasonable agreement with the corresponding theoretical FLD predictions, which indicate a 2- to 3-fold increase in the forming limits with respect to the quasistatic case.
To confirm the bioinformatic predictions which indicate E2F1 as a possible target of hsa-miR-9* (Figure 3), we transfected a synthetic hsa-mir-9* (Figure 4A) or its inhibitor (Figure 4B) in a human B lymphoblastoid cell line, and then measured E2F1 expression both at the mRNA and protein levels by qRT-PCR and western blotting, respectively.
Furthermore, about one tenth of the multi-exon genes (2, 003/10.8%) are supported only by de novo predictions, which indicates that de novo predictions are indispensable to the completeness of the final gene sets.
Models G(A + X) and Gc(A + X) resulted in the same reliability of genomic predictions, which indicates that a G matrix that took sex-linked inheritance for X-specific markers into account did not improve genomic prediction more than a G matrix that dealt with X-specific markers as autosomal markers, possibly because animals in the present data were all bulls.
Finally, it is interesting to compare the individual keywords associated with disorder prediction and with those associated with the absence of disorder prediction (which indicate structure-associated functions).
The P value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for the prediction model was 0.65, which indicated the good statistical fit of the model.AUC values of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.92) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96) were obtained in the training and validation sets, respectively.
A fourth measure is the prediction interval, which indicates the distribution of true effect sizes and is based on T2 [ 2].
Moreover, the predicted EC50 values of 5 active compounds well matched with the experiment values (R2 = 0.93, Table 1), which indicated that the prediction model by NEF would be reliable.
