Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The predictions were slightly better when an increased power number was used.
Reliabilities of genomic predictions were slightly lower with imputed sequence data than with BovineHD chip data.
The weekly, T+4 predictions were slightly less accurate with a PPV of 0.556, a NPV of 0.973, a sensitivity of 0.469, and a specificity of 0.981.
Similar(57)
However, when reduction factors were removed from the AASHTO or AISC prediction equations, actual ultimate loads were an average of 5% higher than predicted values, with certain predictions being slightly nonconservative.
Compared with other forecasters, the World Bank's predictions are slightly more pessimistic.
Furthermore, the numerical results revealed that the ANFIS-based predictions are slightly superior to the FIS-based predictions.
The European Code predictions are slightly more conservative than the American Specification and the direct strength method predictions.
However, the plane stress model predictions are slightly better in the ductile regions while the plane strain model predictions are better along the edge of the interface in the elastic region.
At older ages the predictions are slightly higher than the observed values.
This might indicate that cpgISg predictions are slightly better than the other two, the original cpg50 and cpgISc.
The ab initio predictions are slightly broader with the middle 90% ranging from 51 to 365 base pairs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com