Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(33)
The predicted concentrations of 5-HMF obtained by MCR-ALS and PLS versus HPLC predictions were evaluated.
Predictions were evaluated using cross validation and an independent dataset.
Model predictions were evaluated by comparison to measurements of temperature, water saturation, displacement, and air permeability.
The numerical predictions were evaluated by comparisons with measured temperature and flux distributions.
Sequence predictions were evaluated for protein sequences, text data, music files etc. Route prediction is not covered by this work.
The quality of fatigue load predictions were evaluated for bending moments of two blades, in edgewise and flapwise directions.
Similar(27)
Calibration of the nomogram predictions was evaluated by comparing the predicted probability at 5 years with the Kaplan Meier survival probability using the training data (internal calibration).
As an important criterion for model evaluation, the bias of the genomic predictions was evaluated (See Additional file 1: Tables S1, S2 and S3).
As for the simplex projection, the accuracy of predictions is evaluated by the correlation coefficient between the predicted and the observed series.
Considering that our IRES analysis included the same number of UTR sequences (99,759) and that 6,532 of them were predicted as containing IRESs, the false discovery rate of our predictions was evaluated to be 5%%.
Predictions are evaluated against press-formed components.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com