Perhaps, Turing overestimated the rate of progress of technology, or of transformation of deeply entrenched paradigms of thought; but whatever the reason, his prediction about the feasibility of "thinking machines" is yet to come true in an engineering or in a symbolic-semantic sense.
Some examples of this type of thinking can be found in papers on risk prediction models [ 2, 3].
But this line of thinking overstates the accuracy of ocean-current models: after Fukushima, predictions of how much radioactive material would reach North America varied by a factor of ten, and didn't even agree on what year it would arrive.
Which, despite the ridiculousness of thinking about all those 0s, seems like a fairly reasonable prediction when it comes to the house that Jobs built.
New way of thinking: really?
Old way of thinking: really?
That is, both ways of thinking about the decision making process in extensive games (with imperfect information) lead to the same recommendations/predictions.
Mentalizing is the capacity of thinking about thinking and feeling.
In essence, algorithmic thinking is simultaneously a method of thinking and a means for thinking about one's thinking".
The systems way of thinking.
