In the latter context, models can be erroneous by leaving out "negligible" factors and, at least for reasonable times, our model predictions do not differ significantly with the target systems we are modeling (wait long enough, however, and such predictions will differ significantly).
Although the assumption was made that all c i are equal, that assumption can readily be relaxed a and predictions do not differ particularly unless one c i is very large.
For each gene, the average r-values were similar if averages were compared by tissue type and genotype, suggesting that the relationship between empirically determined nucleosome distribution and sequence-based predictions does not differ between wild type and mutant or the analyzed tissues.
We observe that different kinds of secondary structure prediction outputs (single-state prediction, single-state prediction with a confidence index, and three-state probability prediction) do not differ greatly in the amount of structural information they yield, so long as the methods formulated in this work to generate propensity distributions are applied appropriately.
Our finding that the deviation of implemented redistribution from the pocketbook prediction does not differ across treatments when pivotality is independent of class structure also holds for individual choices.
Regardless of the data source from which functional status information was derived, the performance of the mortality prediction model did not differ in a statistically significant manner.
None of the interaction terms should be statistically significant if the prediction model did not differ between current and previous ALSPAC children.
In 3 other regions the prediction rate did not differ from chance level: left orbital inferior frontal gyrus: 53.8% (MSE: 2.6%, t(14) = 1.47, P = 0.081), left inferior frontal gyrus: 49.1% (MSE: 2.2%, t(14) < 1), left superior frontal gyrus: 51.4% (MSE: 2.3%, t(14) < 1].
Contrary to predictions, search performance did not differ as a function of participants' hand position.
Only in the IPS was the observed classification accuracy for the one-dimensional classifier lower than predicted, t(15) = 2.247, p=0.040; for all other ROIs, the prediction and data did not differ significantly (all t(15) < 1.206, p>0.247).
