Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
We do note whenever the predictions are either particularly robust or ambiguous.
Similar(59)
The final 8 predictions were either "likely false" (6) or "false" (2).
However, the majority of the database predictions were either incomplete or inconsistent.
Similar proportions of the predictions were either too optimistic (35% of predictions more than 1.33 times the actual survival) or too pessimistic (39% of predictions <0.67 times the actual survival).
The output of prediction are either probabilitiesy of species' occurrence or density measures.
Two (4%) showed an exact match to the predicted tissues; in six cases (13%), the prediction was either a subclass or a 'part_of' the tissue used in the EQ statement; in 13 cases (28%), the tissue used in the EQ statement was a 'part_of' or subclass of the predicted tissue; and in 26 association rules (55%), the tissue predicted was not in a relationship with the tissue used for the EQ statement.
My prediction was either so smart or so ludicrous that it ended up on NBA.com.
Moreover, the peptide coverage illustrates that the longer TigrScan prediction is either a valid splice variant of the coded protein or the Release4 prediction failed to identify both the N and C terminal segments of the protein, both of which have been validated by MS data and, in the case of the N-terminal, EST data.
A correct prediction is either a True Positive (TP) or a True Negative (TN), while an incorrect prediction is either a False Positive (FP) or a False Negative (FN).
However, the gains in accuracy of prediction were either of small magnitude in simulated data or not at all apparent when applied to back fat thickness data in pigs, as was also observed in our application.
Feedback for participants' prediction was either 'correct' plus a high pitched beep (22,050 Hz, 500 ms) or 'incorrect' plus a low pitched beep (44,100 Hz, 500 ms) for 1 s.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com