Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(21)
During this process, the targeted mechanical properties and the reliability of their predictions are considered simultaneously.
If a chemical is within the AD because it is similar to the substances used to set up the model, predictions are considered most trustworthy.
During this process, the targeted mechanical properties and the reliability of their predictions are considered simultaneously in the above objective functions.
We show over six different DTI datasets that DASPfind outperforms other state-of-the-art methods when the single top-ranked predictions are considered, or when a drug with no known targets or with few known targets is considered.
Inconsistencies in design capacity predictions are considered to be due to the fact that the specimen length and support conditions pertaining to the test set-up varied among past experimental studies.
We show that on average, over the four gold standard DTI datasets, DASPfind significantly outperforms other existing methods when the single top-ranked predictions are considered, resulting in 46.17 % of these predictions being correct, and it achieves 49.22 % correct single top ranked predictions when the set of all DTIs for a single drug is tested.
Similar(39)
Abundance predictions were considered correct if the range of abundances that a model predicted a species should obtain 95% of the time encompassed the observed abundance value.
Thus the first 3 ( <img src="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/asset?id=info?doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0014556.e154.PNG" class= inline-graphic"/> ) ones in the 24-order predictions is considered.
That is, an allele with multiple predictions is considered correct if the true solution is included.
A consensus of all the secondary structure predictions was considered for a better validity.
Considering a large dairy cattle population, a small improvement in reliability of predictions is considered important for cattle breeding.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com