Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
The quantitative results compared between IRI-2012 model predictions and observations show that the predicted foF2 values are basically underestimated and the magnitude of their deviations obviously increases with increasing solar activity.
This observed difference in CCN activity is in agreement with predictions and observations that sea salt particles have lower hygroscopic growth factors than NaCl at RH >75% (i.e., above the deliquescence RH of NaCl).
Any gap between the predictions and observations would mean that the theory is wrong.
At the scale of the trend, the predictions and observations shared a common surface.
The results show fairly good agreement between the predictions and observations.
The agreements between the predictions and observations were evaluated using coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE).
By considering entire distributions, this approach generalizes traditional approaches to validation that focus only on the mean behaviors of predictions and observations.
A comparison between model predictions and observations from laboratory scale UCG experiments on the same coal shows an excellent match for both exit gas quality and cavity growth.
An excellent agreement between predictions and observations has been found, with only one (out of 12) cases providing an incorrect prediction.
It is suggested that this phenomenon could account for some of the discrepancies between IRI predictions and observations, at least for daytime low-latitude locations.
This review compares the observations of the bow shocks and upstream waves at Venus and Mars, with reference to model predictions and observations at Mercury and Earth.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com