Sentence examples for prediction c from inspiring English sources

But Pólya made the more realistic assumption that Leverrier's prediction C (a bright spot near a certain point in the sky at a certain time) was highly probable but not 100%, given his H (i.e., Newton's laws and observational data about Uranus).

Fig. 5 a Scatter of numerical versus actual current (meridional) at the same time step, b scatter of corrected numerical versus actual current (meridional) for a 1-day ahead prediction, c time series of raw numerical, corrected numerical as well as actual current (meridional) all at site 1 for testing period.

Fig. 6 a Scatter of numerical versus actual current (zonal) at the same time step, b scatter of corrected numerical versus actual current (zonal) for a 3-days ahead prediction, c time series of raw numerical, corrected numerical as well as actual current (zonal) all at site 2 for testing period.

Moreover, the addition of apoA-I glycation relative intensity significantly improved the risk prediction (C statistic, from 0.768 to 0.907; P < 0.001; net reclassification improvement, 9.56%; P < 0.001).

SMI added to the prediction of an event in the following 5 years above and beyond routine assessment risk prediction (c statistic with or without SMI 0.788 [0.720–0.855] and 0.705 [0.616 0.794], respectively).

2. Stochastic selection of a class subset l or m, with probability q[ l | m ](x) for l and 1 - q[ l | m ](x) for m. 3. Random selection of a single class prediction c in the above selected subset l or m.

When the TH index was integrated with the genomic and/or clinical variables, the power of risk prediction (C-index) appeared to improve (p < 2.2 × 10−16, t-test between with TH index and without TH index) (Fig. 3b).

Similarly, age was also significantly better than random prediction (c-statistic 0.609, 95% CI: 0.570, 0.649, P<.01).

To test this prediction, c-Cbl abundance was reduced in CFBE41o- cells stably expressing ∆F508-CFTR by RNA mediated interference (siRNA).

In the population overall, the 40-SNP genetic risk score marginally improved risk prediction (C-statistics: 0.903 and 0.906, without and with the score; P = 0.04), whereas the 17-SNP score did not (P = 0.11) (supplementary Table A4).

The final LVQ predictions c L V Q ∈ [ 0, 1 ] were computed as averages over the 26 L-O-O results.